AgeOfSpace Wiki

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
(Image: [[https://cff2.earth.com/uploads/2024/06/16150759/Depression-memory.jpg|https://cff2.earth.com/uploads/2024/06/16150759/Depression-memory.jpg]])Non-uniform memory access (NUMA) is a computer memory design used in multiprocessing, where the memory entry time is dependent upon the memory location relative to the processor. Under NUMA, a processor can entry its personal native [[https://www.ekonomicky.sk/vyvoj-ekonomiky-sr/|Memory Wave memory booster]] quicker than non-local memory (memory native to a different processor or memory shared between processors). NUMA is helpful for workloads with excessive memory locality of reference and low lock contention, because a processor may operate on a subset of [[http://global.gwangju.ac.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=g0101&wr_id=856412|Memory Wave]] principally or entirely within its own cache node, decreasing site visitors on the memory bus. NUMA architectures logically follow in scaling from symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) architectures. They have been developed commercially in the course of the nineties by Unisys, Convex Pc (later Hewlett-Packard), Honeywell Data Techniques Italy (HISI) (later Groupe Bull), Silicon Graphics (later Silicon Graphics International), Sequent Computer Systems (later IBM), Data General (later EMC, now Dell Applied sciences), Digital (later Compaq, then HP, now HPE) and ICL. Methods developed by these companies later featured in a wide range of Unix-like working programs, and to an extent in Home windows NT.



(Image: [[https://images.pexels.com/photos/7552453/pexels-photo-7552453.jpeg|https://images.pexels.com/photos/7552453/pexels-photo-7552453.jpeg]])Symmetrical Multi Processing XPS-100 household of servers, designed by Dan Gielan of Huge [[https://openclipart.org/search/?query=Company|Company]] for Honeywell Data Programs Italy. Trendy CPUs operate considerably quicker than the main memory they use. Within the early days of computing and knowledge processing, the CPU typically ran slower than its personal memory. The efficiency traces of processors and memory crossed in the 1960s with the arrival of the first supercomputers. Since then, CPUs more and more have found themselves "starved for knowledge" and having to stall while waiting for knowledge to arrive from [[https://americanspeedways.net/index.php/This_Checklist_Is_Just_Not_All_Inclusive|Memory Wave]] (e.g. for Von-Neumann structure-based computer systems,  [[http://124.223.222.61:3000/angeline25c201/3123049/wiki/%22stores%22-The-Memory-Of-The-Stimuli|Memory Wave memory booster]] see Von Neumann bottleneck). Many supercomputer designs of the 1980s and 1990s targeted on offering high-speed memory entry as opposed to sooner processors, allowing the computers to work on massive data sets at speeds other methods could not method. Limiting the variety of memory accesses provided the key to extracting high efficiency from a trendy laptop. For commodity processors, this meant installing an ever-rising quantity of excessive-velocity cache memory and utilizing more and more subtle algorithms to avoid cache misses.
[[//www.youtube.com/embed/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IzSIaWQHIY/hq720.jpg?v=67ecf5ad\u0026sqp=-oaymwEnCOgCEMoBSFryq4qpAxkIARUAAIhCGAHYAQHiAQoIGBACGAY4AUAB\u0026rs=AOn4CLCwwvBDH8dDOLnlVkjtpHqa66GjZw|external site]]


But the dramatic improve in dimension of the working techniques and of the functions run on them has typically overwhelmed these cache-processing improvements. Multi-processor techniques without NUMA make the issue significantly worse. Now a system can starve a number of processors at the same time, notably as a result of only one processor can access the computer's memory at a time. NUMA makes an attempt to address this problem by providing separate memory for every processor, avoiding the efficiency hit when several processors try to address the same memory. For issues involving unfold knowledge (frequent for servers and comparable applications), NUMA can improve the performance over a single shared memory by a factor of roughly the variety of processors (or separate memory banks). Another strategy to addressing this drawback is the multi-channel memory architecture, in which a linear increase within the variety of memory channels will increase the memory access concurrency linearly. In fact, not all knowledge finally ends up [[https://pinterest.com/search/pins/?q=confined|confined]] to a single activity, which signifies that multiple processor might require the identical information.



To handle these circumstances, NUMA programs embrace extra hardware or software to move knowledge between memory banks. This operation slows the processors hooked up to those banks, so the general velocity improve due to NUMA heavily will depend on the nature of the working tasks. AMD applied NUMA with its Opteron processor (2003), utilizing HyperTransport. Intel announced NUMA compatibility for its x86 and Itanium servers in late 2007 with its Nehalem and Tukwila CPUs. Practically all CPU architectures use a small amount of very fast non-shared memory known as cache to take advantage of locality of reference in memory accesses. With NUMA, maintaining cache coherence throughout shared memory has a big overhead. Though simpler to design and build, non-cache-coherent NUMA programs change into prohibitively complicated to program in the usual von Neumann structure programming model. Usually, ccNUMA uses inter-processor communication between cache controllers to maintain a constant memory picture when more than one cache shops the same memory location.